In the world of action cameras, DJI is making waves again, with the upcoming DJI Osmo Nano. Details of this compact powerhouse have leaked, giving us a sneak peek into what’s set to be a formidable addition to the action camera market.

The DJI Osmo Nano’s specs have surfaced on an Australian retail website, courtesy of DroneXL. The camera boasts an “all-new” 1/1.3-inch sensor, capable of capturing 4K video at a smooth 60 frames per second. With a 143-degree field of view, it promises to capture wide, immersive scenes. But it’s not just about the video; the Osmo Nano is also said to have an impressive battery life, lasting up to 200 minutes on a single charge. Moreover, it’s waterproof up to 10 meters, eliminating the need for additional casing or protection.

DJI’s marketing copy hints at the camera’s versatility, stating it “can be set up in multiple positions, helping you capture inventive angles and enjoy greater creative freedom.” The listed specs suggest there could be 128GB of storage on board, ensuring you won’t run out of space mid-adventure.

The Osmo Nano is also set to offer two stabilization modes. Horizon Balancing will correct those pesky horizon tilts, while RockSteady 3.0 promises to reduce camera shake without dampening the intensity of movement. Together with the leaked images, these features give us a clear picture of what to expect from DJI’s latest action cam.

This isn’t the first time the DJI Osmo Nano has leaked. It’s previously made appearances on DJI’s social media channels and in leaked images. While there’s no official confirmation yet, a starting price of €369 (around $435 / £320 / AU$655) has been rumored.

DJI has a launch event scheduled for Tuesday, September 23. While they’re keeping the details under wraps, it’s highly likely that we’ll see the DJI Osmo Nano make its official debut. We’ll be on the lookout for any announcements and bring you the latest as soon as it’s official.

In the meantime, if you’re in the market for an action camera, you might want to consider the best action cameras currently available. DJI, known for its drones, is taking another swing at tiny modular action cams, and the Osmo Nano could be a strong contender. If you’re curious about DJI’s recent offerings, check out our hands-on with the DJI Mini 5 Pro and the DJI Mini 4K.

Stay tuned for more updates on the DJI Osmo Nano and other exciting developments in the world of action cameras.

Three years ago, I welcomed the iPad Pro 12.9 (2021) into my life, expecting it to be my primary creative tool. It’s served me well, accompanying me on trains, planes, and even to my favorite coffee shop. But recently, I’ve found myself in a creative conundrum: I’ve been cheating on my iPad with another device, the Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C.

Two years back, I reviewed this lesser-known ereader for TopTenReviews. It gathered dust for a year and a half after the review, but recently, I’ve found myself reaching for it more often than my iPad. Here’s why.

Meet the Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C

The Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C is an ereader that’s more than meets the eye. It’s akin to the Kindle Scribe, but with features turned up to 11. It’s expensive, at $600 / £600 / AU$980, and that’s without the keyboard folio. It boasts a 10.3-inch color display and offers the Google Play Store, making it a tablet as well.

As an old-school book and pen-and-paper enthusiast, I was skeptical. But the Onyx won me over with its unique features and user experience.

The iPad’s Shortcomings

My iPad is a jack of all trades, but it’s not the best at any one thing. It’s powerful for video editing, but not as powerful as my edit rig. Its keyboard is useful, but not as natural as my laptop or PC. And while it’s portable, it’s not as portable as my phone. But its biggest flaw? It doesn’t replicate the feeling of writing with a pen on paper.

Using an Apple Pencil or a knock-off, the iPad’s stylus just doesn’t provide the same tactile experience as pen and paper. It lacks the pressure, the squeeze of your fingertips, the firm lunge of the pen, and the solid barrier of your arm. It’s a significant difference that’s hard to quantify until you’ve experienced it.

A New Writing Experience

Frustrated with the iPad’s handwriting shortcomings, I resorted to pen and paper. But that led to another set of problems: lost papers, coffee-stained notes, and a desk full of illegible scribbles. Then I moved house and asked myself: ‘Am I going to use this?’ I hesitated. Maybe this device could fix my writing problem.

I charged it up, opened a blank page, and started to scrawl. The Onyx offered a natural-feeling handwriting experience that the iPad didn’t. A few neat touches made the Boox’s stylus feel more like a pen. The haptic feedback, the ‘give’ when pushing down, and the pen nib that can be attached when not in use all contributed to this comfortable writing experience. The E-Ink screen, which looks more like paper than a tablet screen, also helped convince my brain that I was writing on paper, not a smart device.

The Ultra Ereader’s Useful Features

I was won over by the handwriting experience, but what kept me using the Onyx was its useful features. Like Kindles, you can import documents onto the device, which I found handy for annotating scripts and filling in shot lists on film shoots. The Boox’s long battery life was another advantage over the iPad.

The Onyx also offers note-taking documents, which aren’t just clean pages but documents with various style designs. I could create pages for ideas and add separate sub-pages for different facets or angles. The Smart Selection feature, which lets you draw a lasso around notes for auto-selection, became a vital part of my workflow.

I never used the device’s Play Store access or read books with it, but I recall from my review testing time that you can mark up e-books as well. The Onyx’s features kept me focused and undistracted, unlike the iPad, which has too many temptations like social media, games, and downloaded TV shows.

Keeping the iPad Around?

Since discovering the Onyx, it’s become a stalwart part of my creative life. It’s my go-to device for jotting down ideas or structuring plans and lists during the genesis stage of a new project. It hasn’t replaced my iPad or PC, but it’s a faff-free interface with the digital realm, letting me ignore the annoyances of artifice and spew my thoughts and ideas straight onto the (digital) page.

In conclusion, my iPad is still a valuable tool, but the Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C has become an unexpected yet welcome addition to my creative workflow. It’s not about replacing one device with another, but finding the right tool for the right job. And sometimes, that means having an affair with an ereader.

For years, whispers of Apple introducing a touchscreen MacBook have persisted, yet the tech giant has consistently maintained its disinterest. However, a recent report from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggests that Apple might be gearing up to change its stance. According to Kuo, a touchscreen MacBook Pro could enter mass production as early as late 2026, signaling a significant shift for a company that has largely avoided this feature.

As someone who’s not particularly fond of the idea of a touchscreen Mac, I must admit, this news gives me pause. My concerns aren’t just about practical implications; they also reflect on what this change might say about Apple as a company. Nevertheless, a touchscreen MacBook is seemingly on the horizon, and it’s worth exploring why this is happening now.

A Late Entry into the Touchscreen Laptop Market

The news that Apple is only now considering a touchscreen Mac might seem surprising, given that most other manufacturers have already embraced the feature. However, Apple’s resistance to touchscreen laptops is not new. The company has long held that ergonomics are a significant barrier to this technology.

Steve Jobs himself once famously dismissed touchscreen computers, stating that they were so ergonomically challenging that they could cause arm strain. Constantly reaching up to touch a screen can indeed be tiring, and holding your arms horizontally isn’t the most comfortable position. Moreover, touchscreens can quickly become smudged with fingerprints, which not only affects the display’s appearance but also the user experience.

Apple has never explicitly admitted this, but the pristine appearance of its products might be another reason why it’s been reluctant to adopt touchscreens on laptops. A smudged-up screen doesn’t exactly scream ‘premium,’ and regular cleaning can become a distraction from work.

A Shift in Apple’s Identity?

On a deeper level, Kuo’s report raises questions about Apple’s identity as a company. While no one will be forced to use the touchscreen element of a touchscreen MacBook, the fact that Apple might add it to its laptops at all signals a significant change in attitude. Following the crowd has never been Apple’s modus operandi. The company is known for contributing to a field only if it believes it can do something better than everyone else.

However, Apple has made several questionable decisions in recent years, from its failed self-driving car project to the Vision Pro headset, and being left behind in AI. Without strong leadership at the helm, it seems Apple is making poor decisions more frequently than it used to. Under Steve Jobs, the company had a clear vision and identity that guided its decisions. Now, it feels like that identity is weakening, leading Apple to explore paths it never would have before.

What’s Changed?

If Kuo is correct, something must have changed Apple’s mind. People’s arms haven’t suddenly become more flexible, so what compelling reason has arisen to create a touchscreen Mac that wasn’t there before? Kuo suggests that Apple’s decision reflects its observations of iPad user behavior, indicating that touch controls can enhance productivity and user experience in certain scenarios.

However, interacting with an iPad is typically done with the tablet held flat or at an angle, which doesn’t strain the arms. In contrast, a MacBook screen is more or less vertical, requiring a more horizontal arm position. Perhaps Apple has suddenly decided that this isn’t uncomfortable after all.

Another possibility is that Kuo’s report means the touch element will be integrated somewhere other than the display, such as inside or alongside the trackpad. We know Apple is at least considering this. Kuo’s wording refers to a “touch panel” rather than a “touchscreen,” which could hint at this alternative implementation.

A Hope for Innovative Integration

Regardless of the specifics, my hope is that Apple has a convincing implementation of a touch panel that can add functionality without encountering the same old problems highlighted by Jobs. Apple is known for its persistent innovation. Simply adding features because everyone else is doing so would signal a significant change in the mindset that has served it so well over the years.

Steve Jobs would likely have hated this touchscreen Mac idea, given his past sentiments. The likelihood is that he would have shut it down in the ideation phase. Resistance to the concept of a touchscreen MacBook isn’t about sticking religiously to the whims of a previous CEO. If those ideas are still relevant, they can provide useful guidance. And for all his flaws, Jobs was known for his excellent taste and forward-thinking designs.

Apple’s ideas have served it well over the years. It’s not a follower, nor a company that shamelessly imitates others in a desperate bid for clout. I just hope that this touchscreen Mac rumor doesn’t indicate a fundamental change in that mindset. Only time will tell if Apple can innovate with touch technology in a way that truly enhances the MacBook experience.

In our collective consciousness, technology often appears neutral, devoid of human bias due to its unthinking and unfeeling nature. However, the reality with AI, particularly generative models, is starkly different. These models, trained on vast amounts of internet-scraped data, are not immune to the bigotry and prejudice that pervades online content. Instead, they amplify and perpetuate these biases in their outputs.

Generative AI, especially large consumer-focused models, are trained on a diverse range of data sources, from articles and videos to social media posts. This data, however, is not a neutral reflection of reality. It’s heavily influenced by human biases, prejudices, and misinformation, especially prevalent in today’s often-hostile social media landscape. Charlotte Wilson, Head of Enterprise at Check Point Software, delves into this issue, highlighting the potential dangers and the need for vigilance.

The Problem with Generative AI

Generative AI models are designed to be helpful and useful, but this can lead to sycophantic behavior. They prioritize what they’ve learned and what they think users want to hear, rather than absolute accuracy. This is problematic because the data these models learn from is inherently tainted by human bias. Moreover, businesses are increasingly integrating these models into critical areas like recruitment, data analysis, and HR, exacerbating the issue.

Wilson argues AI should not operate independently in human-centric tasks. She envisions a new role, ‘AI checkers’, responsible for assessing model outputs for biases and addressing them. However, she also acknowledges the challenges in ensuring unbiased AI, given the tainted nature of the data pool.

The Challenge of Ensuring Unbiased AI

The internet, a primary source of data for AI models, is a battleground of misinformation and bias. Workday, for instance, is facing a lawsuit alleging its AI hiring tool discriminates against older candidates. Despite Workday’s denial, the case underscores the challenge of avoiding discrimination in AI, especially when the data pool is so tainted.

Wilson admits that fixing the internet’s issues is nearly impossible, given the constant influx of misinformation. She suggests that the solution lies in rigorous checking and fact-verification processes. This could spawn a new industry dedicated to AI bias moderation, helping offset job market losses caused by automation.

The Political Climate and Bias Correction

However, there’s a larger question looming: Is there a genuine appetite to correct biases, especially in the current political climate? The Trump administration’s rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies raises concerns. Many tech companies, despite operating globally, are headquartered in the US, potentially influencing their approach to DEI.

Wilson points out that while these companies follow anti-discrimination laws, they no longer have dedicated teams focused on equity. This suggests that there might not be a strong drive to correct inequalities, potentially leading to their amplification by AI models.

A Call for Purposeful AI Deployment

Wilson’s advice to businesses is clear: be purposeful in AI deployment. Always consider the human impact of your models, and ensure that there’s a governance check in place, including representatives focused solely on human fairness. After all, AI is a powerful tool, but it’s humans who ultimately bear the responsibility for its ethical use.

In conclusion, while AI offers immense potential, it’s crucial to acknowledge and address the biases it inherits and amplifies. This requires a multi-pronged approach, from rigorous data checking to purposeful AI deployment and robust governance. It’s a complex challenge, but one that’s essential to ensure that AI truly serves and benefits all humans, rather than perpetuating existing inequalities.

The demand for free VPNs has surged, driven by users seeking privacy and security online. However, this increased interest has also brought forth a proliferation of unvetted, unsafe options. At best, these free VPNs monetize user data through invasive ads and tracking; at worst, they’re run by cybercriminals spreading malware or sharing data with foreign governments. Established free VPNs often employ a freemium model, offering limited features or data caps, encouraging users to upgrade to paid versions.

Enter EventVPN, a newcomer aiming to disrupt this broken market. Backed by ExpressVPN, one of the industry’s leading providers, EventVPN promises unlimited, free access without data caps. However, it introduces a new trade-off: ads. While Hotspot Shield Basic has dabbled in this approach, EventVPN takes it a step further, integrating ads into the user experience while still maintaining a privacy-first stance.

EventVPN’s strategy is to leverage Apple’s in-app advertising systems (ATT and IDFA) to separate user data from the advertising process. This allows the VPN to generate revenue without compromising user privacy. As a result, free users can enjoy premium features like secure streaming and P2P support, along with ExpressVPN’s robust security measures, without bandwidth restrictions.

While ads may seem intrusive, EventVPN argues that they can be transparent and non-intrusive. Users can choose to receive personalized ads or not, and while ads will disrupt the VPN experience, they can be avoided by upgrading to EventVPN Premium for a yearly fee of $69.99. However, users seeking better value might find cheaper alternatives among the best budget VPNs.

EventVPN’s approach is a breath of fresh air in the free VPN market, offering a reliable, secure tool for torrenting, streaming, and privacy without cost. However, it remains to be seen whether this model can truly fix the market’s issues. Only time and user feedback will tell if EventVPN’s unique blend of premium features and ad-funded model can make a lasting impact.

Meanwhile, other developments in the VPN landscape include a significant spike in VPN demand in the UK following the enforcement of age verification checks, and Apple’s release of iOS 26, which includes substantial security upgrades to protect users from mercenary spyware attacks. ExpressVPN has also recently updated its iPhone VPN app, making it even easier to use.

In conclusion, the free VPN market is in dire need of improvement, and EventVPN’s innovative approach offers a promising solution. As users continue to seek online privacy and security, it’s crucial to have reliable, safe tools available. Whether EventVPN can truly fix the market remains to be seen, but its entry is a welcome addition to the app stores, providing users with another safe option to consider.

Mark your calendars for the UCI Road World Championships 2025, taking place from September 21 to 28, 2025, in Kigali, Rwanda. This prestigious event, celebrating its 104th edition, is set to make history as it takes place on African soil for the first time. Here’s your comprehensive guide to watching the elite cycling action live, including free streams and global broadcast details.

Free Streams and Global Broadcasts

BBC iPlayer (UK) & UCI YouTube Channel (selected regions):
Fans in the UK can enjoy free live streams of the men’s and women’s time trials, as well as the men’s road race on BBC iPlayer. Additionally, the UCI’s official YouTube channel will stream live action in selected regions where there’s no other official rights holder.

Free-to-air broadcasters in Europe:
Several free-to-air broadcasters across Europe will provide live cycling coverage with domestic commentary. These include France TV (France), Sporza and RTBF (Belgium), Rai (Italy), ZDF (Germany), NPO (Netherlands), RTP (Portugal), and TVE (Spain).

Watch from Anywhere with a VPN

If you’re traveling abroad and can’t access your usual streaming service, a VPN can help. NordVPN, our top recommendation, lets you connect as if you were back home, unlocking your usual service. It’s user-friendly, offers excellent speed and security, and comes with a 70% discount. Plus, there’s a 30-day money-back guarantee.

US and Canada: FloBikes

In the US and Canada, specialist cycling streamer FloBikes has the live coverage of the UCI Road World Championships 2025. A monthly subscription costs $29.99 in the US and CA$39.99 in Canada, or you can commit to a year for better value ($12.49/month in the US and CA$200/year in Canada). If you’re out of the country, use a VPN to access FloBikes.

Australia: Stan Sport

Australian fans can watch the event on Stan Sport, which costs $20 a month on top of a regular Stan subscription (from $12/month). If you’re traveling, use a VPN to access Stan Sport.

Mobile Access and Social Media

Most broadcasters offer mobile apps or browser-based streaming, allowing you to watch the action on the go. Stay up-to-date with the official UCI social media channels: X (@Kigali2025), Instagram (@kigali2025), Facebook (Kigali 2025), and the UCI YouTube channel.

Event Schedule

The UCI Road World Championships 2025 will take place over eight days, with the Women’s Elite Individual Time Trial kicking off the action on September 21, and the Men’s Elite Road Race bringing the curtain down on September 28. Here’s the full schedule:

Sunday, September 21:
– 4.10am ET / 9.10am BST – Women’s Elite Individual Time Trial
– 7.45am ET / 12.45pm BST – Men’s Elite Individual Time Trial

Monday, September 22:
– 4.35am ET / 9.35am BST – Women’s U23 Individual Time Trial
– 7.35am ET / 12.35pm BST – Men’s U23 Individual Time Trial

Tuesday, September 23:
– 4.45am ET / 9.45am BST – Women’s Junior Individual Time Trial
– 8am ET / 1pm BST – Men’s Junior Individual Time Trial

Wednesday, September 24:
– 6.30am ET / 11.30am BST – Team Time Trial Mixed Relay

Thursday, September 25:
– 7.05am ET / 12.05pm BST – Women’s U23 Road Race

Friday, September 26:
– 2am ET / 7am BST – Men’s Junior Road Race
– 6am ET / 11am BST – Men’s U23 Road Race

Saturday, September 27:
– 2.20am ET / 7.20am BST – Women’s Junior Road Race
– 6.05am ET / 11.05am BST – Women’s Elite Road Race

Sunday, September 28:
– 3.45am ET / 8.45am BST – Men’s Elite Road Race

Disclaimer: We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved. This guide is intended for legal recreational uses, such as accessing services from another country or protecting your online security and privacy when abroad. Always ensure you’re complying with the terms and conditions of your streaming service and local laws.

Google’s Gemini, the company’s conversational AI, is on a trajectory to become even more personalized, with recent developments hinting at a potential integration with Google Photos. Last month, Google quietly rolled out updates to Gemini’s personalization settings, and now, hidden within its user interface, lies a promising new reference. Users might soon have the option to allow Gemini to tailor their chat experience using insights derived from Google Photos.

This new setting, currently under wraps, suggests that Gemini will soon be able to analyze content from Google Photos. A prompt suggesting users “ask Gemini” for more information leads to an updated personalization section in settings, where the eventual connection between Gemini and Google Photos is likely to be managed.

This change could significantly impact users who rely on Google Photos as their primary digital photo archive. With access to photo metadata and visual content, Gemini could leverage contextual information about people, locations, and significant life events, going far beyond the basic chat interaction history it currently uses. The potential is enormous: if Gemini can extract relevant context from a user’s photo library, it could surface tailored suggestions, reminders, or even initiate tasks that align closely with the user’s personal history, habits, and relationships. This information is often more nuanced and richer than what users provide via text.

This integration aligns with Google’s broader product strategy, which aims to unify data across its services to power more context-aware AI features. In the past, Google has experimented with using search data for conversational personalization, and now, it seems to be following a similar path as Perplexity, which leverages browsing data from its Comet browser for customization. While there’s no concrete release timeline for Gemini’s Google Photos integration, the gradual shift towards harnessing external data sources marks a notable trend in the evolution of AI assistants.

However, this trend also raises important questions about data privacy and user control. As AI assistants become more integrated with our digital lives, users must be assured that their data is secure and that they have control over how it’s used. Google has been at the forefront of privacy initiatives, such as offering users more control over their data and anonymizing it where possible. Nevertheless, as these features continue to develop, it’s crucial for Google to maintain transparency and provide users with clear choices about how their data is used.

In conclusion, Google’s Gemini is poised to become even more personalized with the potential integration of Google Photos. This move could make Gemini more contextually aware and better equipped to understand and anticipate users’ needs. However, it also underscores the importance of data privacy and user control in the evolving landscape of AI assistants. As Google continues to advance its personalization roadmap, it’s essential to strike a balance between innovation and user privacy. The future of AI assistants, it seems, will be shaped by how well they can adapt to users’ needs while respecting their privacy.